As you are aware, the Royal Instructions direct that the Executive Council should be consulted on all matters, except those specifically exempted.
The houses and other matters enumerated in the Royal Instructions are not to be discussed in the Executive Council. This happens tentatively when it is not in the public interest to consult them, with the possible exception of matters dealt with in these sections, which I have mentioned.
I see that the matters dealt with in these sections are not such as fall within the category of exemption. I have accordingly suggested that the rules may be amended.
The substitution of "Governor-in-Council" for "Governor" is proposed in Section 4(1) and Section 0(12).
JR(4)(1)
...
Page ...
(remainder of the text is not coherent and appears to be OCR errors or unrelated text)
Upon re-examining the original text, it appears that the last part is not making sense. A more plausible correction is:
JCR(85)72 or similar file reference might be a more plausible outcome, however the original text does not provide enough information.
Page XX (the actual number is unclear due to OCR errors)
B
As you are
www
Wh
Royal Motinchures driest that
The for shake consult the
Fesenter Council
except those
ん
on all matters.
hiral or
amended
he houses men hones
miphe
the auctions.
which Ihan mati numerated
in the for minCouncil.
This happens tentarl
the speal of the 3 rice
sey pressing
when it it not be to the puthe
interest to consult them.
with the possible exception of
I see b
the matters healt
with in there sections out
not such as pak within the
I canyony
califony & exemption
I have mentioned
whee t
8. that accordingly brushest
that the wins ever may be.
و
the substitution 9
"Govenor michonnet por
"Suurnor
왠지
0(12)
Juro 4 (1)
the muis is
-1
the last & huer & su 6.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.